Friday, March 9, 2012

a response to Realism and Objectivism in Quantum Mechanics by Vassilios Karakostas

Notes for the Quantum Realist

a response to Realism and Objectivism in Quantum Mechanics by Vassilios Karakostas, Forthcoming in Journal for General Philosophy of Science 2012 (Vol. 43, Issue 1). Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1007/s10838-012-9173-5&cm_mmc=event-_-articleAuthor-_-onlineFirst-_-0

Let there be quantum subsystems S1, S2, and supposed they've interacted. Then

1) what is real for the measuring apparatus is no longer S1 and S2, but a third quantum system S3

If S1 and S2 are represented by vectors on Hilbert spaces HS1 and HS2, respectively, after interaction S3 is represented by a vector on 

If {pi} are all of the properties of S1 and {pj} are all of the properties of S2, then S3 has strictly more properties than all of {pi} and {pj} together.

Kochen-Specker yields one kind of contextuality

2) from a selection of possible measurements, some "properties" depend for their values on which of the measurements are eventually preformed (Kochen-Specker)

these are properties of the single combined quantum system - measuring apparatus.

I would add another kind of contextuality, Relationalism. What is real for the measuring apparatus is S3. At the same time,

3) in a frame of reference in which the singlet particles have not yet interacted, S3 is not real

I'd also add

4) for the Realist, reality is non-local. However, non-locality in this specific sense is not problematic. A pair of particles in the singlet state must, buy (1) above, be thought of as a single third system Ssinglet, not the first particle system and the second particle system. Then, the relevant generalization of the Kochen-Specker theorem shows that this third system Ssinglet does not posses the property of location-in-space-at-this-moment, before measurement by the measuring apparatus. As a result, one can't think of Ssinglet as being contained within all of space, at this moment. There's nothing wrong with this if "space" is just the order relation of quantum interactions: it just means Ssinglet hasn't interacted with the measuring apparatus yet, in a measurement on a Hilbert space in which one can express location.


[note to self: qualia are not usually thought of as being contained within all of 3rd-person space.]

No comments:

Post a Comment